SQLite Forum

Timeline
Login

Many hyperlinks are disabled.
Use anonymous login to enable hyperlinks.

50 most recent events by user kmedcalf occurring on or after 2021-07-09 21:24:41.

2021-07-20
19:57 Reply: Clear shared memory DB and backup problem artifact: 2e0a80011e user: kmedcalf
2021-07-19
22:00 Reply: Different comparison results in WHERE and SELECT clauses artifact: 1b050e6251 user: kmedcalf
20:05 Reply: Unexpected return from the NULL column artifact: 7823fbd6e6 user: kmedcalf
18:58 Edit reply: Unexpected return from the NULL column artifact: a46c91af8c user: kmedcalf
18:56 Reply: Unexpected return from the NULL column artifact: 48cc1c7c6b user: kmedcalf
18:19 Reply: LIKE optimization - limitation to string literals artifact: 5eed38ae42 user: kmedcalf
2021-07-18
23:11 Reply: LIKE optimization - limitation to string literals artifact: 5e068b8c49 user: kmedcalf
22:56 Reply: LIKE optimization - limitation to string literals artifact: 8986c8ea97 user: kmedcalf
20:49 Reply: Inserting One Billion Rows in SQLite Under A Minute artifact: b31eff149e user: kmedcalf
20:38 Reply: Does the column order in an insert statement impact the insert speed? artifact: 28c2401f3c user: kmedcalf
20:21 Reply: Tips for getting SQLite under Python to perform better with more RAM? artifact: 94128a21c8 user: kmedcalf
20:08 Reply: Tips for getting SQLite under Python to perform better with more RAM? artifact: 02f7bda329 user: kmedcalf
00:41 Edit reply: Tips for getting SQLite under Python to perform better with more RAM? artifact: 550045447f user: kmedcalf
00:23 Reply: Tips for getting SQLite under Python to perform better with more RAM? artifact: 44e29996b7 user: kmedcalf
2021-07-17
23:41 Edit reply: ORDER BY not ordering with the correct result artifact: aa0ebe26ed user: kmedcalf
23:39 Reply: ORDER BY not ordering with the correct result artifact: 5c3f79cffa user: kmedcalf
23:25 Reply: (Deleted) artifact: 9d6c41b5fa user: kmedcalf
23:09 Reply: (Deleted) artifact: 78d0c6a2a3 user: kmedcalf
22:52 Reply: ORDER BY not ordering with the correct result artifact: 113c5d7b16 user: kmedcalf
22:29 Reply: (Deleted) artifact: c08eb1e306 user: kmedcalf
22:25 Reply: (Deleted) artifact: a956b84d82 user: kmedcalf
22:20 Reply: Tips for getting SQLite under Python to perform better with more RAM? artifact: 219a431b5d user: kmedcalf
21:44 Reply: (Deleted) artifact: 23fc511d83 user: kmedcalf
21:38 Reply: ORDER BY not ordering with the correct result artifact: b02e7f161a user: kmedcalf
2021-07-13
00:38 Reply: CHECK and ON CONFLICT artifact: ec02265fb3 user: kmedcalf
00:27 Reply: What join is needed for non-similar data? artifact: 7459a2b393 user: kmedcalf
2021-07-12
23:41 Edit reply: How much would you trust a page-level checksum ? artifact: fc577eb803 user: kmedcalf
23:36 Reply: How much would you trust a page-level checksum ? artifact: 1468cbc367 user: kmedcalf
22:14 Reply: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: 4ba5fe1656 user: kmedcalf
21:55 Edit reply: How much would you trust a page-level checksum ? artifact: be9a5dad32 user: kmedcalf
21:53 Reply: How much would you trust a page-level checksum ? artifact: ec10000b20 user: kmedcalf
2021-07-11
22:25 Edit reply: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: 499f52aa70 user: kmedcalf
22:22 Edit reply: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: 8f99ed3223 user: kmedcalf
22:05 Edit reply: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: 764065ab63 user: kmedcalf
22:01 Reply: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: 53216b2928 user: kmedcalf
20:53 Edit reply: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: 50fc0d0a3d user: kmedcalf
20:40 Edit reply: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: 1c2fbbfae9 user: kmedcalf
20:38 Edit reply: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: c2bae8c59b user: kmedcalf
20:36 Edit reply: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: f24446aa83 user: kmedcalf
20:24 Reply: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: 63ac2b56d2 user: kmedcalf
19:50 Reply: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: c9da49bb23 user: kmedcalf
19:38 Edit reply: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: b23c3d34a0 user: kmedcalf
19:36 Reply: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: bcfaddd2d3 user: kmedcalf
18:43 Reply: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: d53b0b1412 user: kmedcalf
2021-07-10
18:05 Reply: Can this SQL be simplified? artifact: 3faafc8a11 user: kmedcalf
18:04 Reply: Can this SQL be simplified? artifact: bf0829e919 user: kmedcalf
16:55 Delete reply: Why can you write triggers using functions from extensions? How does that work? artifact: 5ec4cab66a user: kmedcalf
16:52 Reply: Why can you write triggers using functions from extensions? How does that work? artifact: 8f2b52a006 user: kmedcalf
2021-07-09
22:05 Reply: How to handle collation version changes artifact: 5317344555 user: kmedcalf
21:24 Reply: Linkage #defines are unused artifact: 7bc94de9ec user: kmedcalf