Many hyperlinks are disabled.
Use anonymous login
to enable hyperlinks.
50 events occurring around d892850574659aea.
2020-12-22
| ||
21:59 | • Reply: Possible Bug - View behaves differently to Table in SELECT artifact: 9beb0dfd92 user: wyoung | |
21:57 | • Reply: Possible Bug - View behaves differently to Table in SELECT artifact: 812aa80a35 user: dpratten | |
21:51 | • Post: remark about sqlite3_result_blob and zero-lenght blob artifact: f85d5ab4e5 user: anonymous | |
21:41 | • Reply: Possible Bug - View behaves differently to Table in SELECT artifact: f58191a0dd user: dpratten | |
21:06 | • Reply: Date & Time Data Type artifact: be0a0b5f0f user: jking | |
20:59 | • Reply: Date & Time Data Type artifact: 8cd1036c73 user: anonymous | |
20:54 | • Post: 3 incorrect tables created during import artifact: 2fbb8f94fa user: EricTsau | |
20:29 | • Reply: Date & Time Data Type artifact: 3bef7bf29b user: anonymous | |
20:06 | • Reply: Novice question about employing more complex SQL versus procedural code artifact: 5632f57618 user: 1codedebugger | |
20:00 | • Reply: Consistency of sqlite3_column_* API signatures artifact: 3ff5183018 user: anonymous | |
19:42 | • Reply: Is it possible to bind a single ? in a parameterized query to a listing of values for an in clause? artifact: 8882874efd user: 1codedebugger | |
19:36 | • Reply: Date & Time Data Type artifact: f769ef3880 user: kmedcalf | |
19:28 | • Reply: Date & Time Data Type artifact: 7dd73f93aa user: jking | |
19:01 | • Post: Date & Time Data Type artifact: 9e5b6175fc user: anonymous | |
18:15 | • Reply: historic version documentation artifact: e7c330ab9b user: wyoung | |
13:55 | • Edit reply: bad plan for a query with an OR condition artifact: 8ba73575d5 user: dvdraymond | |
13:50 | • Reply: bad plan for a query with an OR condition artifact: f463bc95cf user: dvdraymond | |
13:41 | • Reply: sqlite3_bind_text with SQLITE_STATIC and SQLITE_TRANSIENT artifact: e555ab52ac user: anonymous | |
13:36 | • Reply: sqlite3_bind_text with SQLITE_STATIC and SQLITE_TRANSIENT artifact: ae26d518ef user: drh | |
13:29 | • Reply: bad plan for a query with an OR condition artifact: 6fdb48f661 user: holgerj | |
11:01 | • Edit reply: Possible Bug - View behaves differently to Table in SELECT artifact: 0948eec194 user: dan | |
11:00 | • Reply: Possible Bug - View behaves differently to Table in SELECT artifact: f58cf903a7 user: dan | |
10:56 | • Reply: Novice question about employing more complex SQL versus procedural code artifact: d10b6adf25 user: cuz | |
09:42 | • Reply: Is it possible to bind a single ? in a parameterized query to a listing of values for an in clause? artifact: 0eecae1b74 user: jake | |
09:10 | • Reply: sqlite3_bind_text with SQLITE_STATIC and SQLITE_TRANSIENT artifact: d892850574 user: anonymous | |
07:46 | • Edit reply: CREATE INDEX ignoring pragma cache_size - is there a way to fix? artifact: ee125fda87 user: curmudgeon | |
07:33 | • Edit: Is it possible to bind a single ? in a parameterized query to a listing of values for an in clause? artifact: 6bcca8840a user: 1codedebugger | |
07:30 | • Post: Is it possible to bind a single ? in a parameterized query to a listing of values for an in clause? artifact: fb74d21679 user: 1codedebugger | |
07:18 | • Reply: Novice question about employing more complex SQL versus procedural code artifact: 15f7261a0a user: 1codedebugger | |
03:44 | • Reply: Novice question about employing more complex SQL versus procedural code artifact: f260acc733 user: jake | |
03:12 | • Edit: Novice question about employing more complex SQL versus procedural code artifact: 82f3082cd0 user: 1codedebugger | |
03:08 | • Post: Novice question about employing more complex SQL versus procedural code artifact: d8117d262b user: 1codedebugger | |
02:29 | • Reply: sqlite3_bind_text with SQLITE_STATIC and SQLITE_TRANSIENT artifact: d515698899 user: 1codedebugger | |
02:00 | • Reply: sqlite3_bind_text with SQLITE_STATIC and SQLITE_TRANSIENT artifact: bacaa1ab02 user: LarryBrasfield | |
01:52 | • Reply: sqlite3_bind_text with SQLITE_STATIC and SQLITE_TRANSIENT artifact: 01ef99ae95 user: 1codedebugger | |
01:39 | • Reply: sqlite3_bind_text with SQLITE_STATIC and SQLITE_TRANSIENT artifact: 360512d027 user: drh | |
01:14 | • Post: sqlite3_bind_text with SQLITE_STATIC and SQLITE_TRANSIENT artifact: 6bd0c53d9d user: 1codedebugger | |
2020-12-21
| ||
21:26 | • Post: Consistency of sqlite3_column_* API signatures artifact: bea5e0cbc9 user: anonymous | |
20:52 | • Reply: Segmentation-Fault with prepared statement artifact: bd706d2342 user: drh | |
20:52 | • Edit: Segmentation-Fault with prepared statement artifact: 5fbedcae69 user: jens1205 | |
20:38 | • Post: Segmentation-Fault with prepared statement artifact: 4c609a4d7a user: jens1205 | |
20:12 | • Reply: CREATE INDEX ignoring pragma cache_size - is there a way to fix? artifact: 17dc88cdff user: kmedcalf | |
18:34 | • Reply: CREATE INDEX ignoring pragma cache_size - is there a way to fix? artifact: c5081ca0be user: anonymous | |
18:32 | • Reply: CREATE INDEX ignoring pragma cache_size - is there a way to fix? artifact: f355e9e80f user: kmedcalf | |
18:27 | • Reply: CREATE INDEX ignoring pragma cache_size - is there a way to fix? artifact: 8d84b45fc3 user: kmedcalf | |
18:22 | • Reply: CREATE INDEX ignoring pragma cache_size - is there a way to fix? artifact: 403900c463 user: kmedcalf | |
17:59 | • Reply: CREATE INDEX ignoring pragma cache_size - is there a way to fix? artifact: 0c262eefb2 user: kmedcalf | |
15:50 | • Edit reply: bad plan for a query with an OR condition artifact: 776b2b39dc user: jivancic | |
15:47 | • Reply: CREATE INDEX ignoring pragma cache_size - is there a way to fix? artifact: 5b28a197dc user: curmudgeon | |
15:46 | • Reply: bad plan for a query with an OR condition artifact: d05e658556 user: dvdraymond | |