SQLite Forum

Timeline
Login

Many hyperlinks are disabled.
Use anonymous login to enable hyperlinks.

50 events occurring around 827409fe28639f20.

2020-12-27
11:29 Post: Off-by-one in testing.html (artifact: 5faa799aa2 user: anonymous)
10:08 Reply: Is using prepared statements without a FROM to employ built-in methods bad practice? (artifact: f88951d6b5 user: cladisch)
08:32 Reply: sqlite-gui application (artifact: 23b709f688 user: little-brother)
08:11 Reply: Creating an emty database (artifact: ea70d6bb74 user: luuk)
02:47 Edit reply: Question about Multiple database connections and loadable extensions. (artifact: ddd21897a6 user: 1codedebugger)
2020-12-26
20:40 Delete reply: Interesting question: Why aren't you using SQLite more? (artifact: 161ca1d86f user: 1codedebugger)
19:35 Post: Is using prepared statements without a FROM to employ built-in methods bad practice? (artifact: 55a255cd76 user: 1codedebugger)
19:06 Reply: sqlite3_expanded_sql for carray with single bound parameter (artifact: 3e2ba0f1b4 user: kmedcalf)
18:30 Reply: Question about Multiple database connections and loadable extensions. (artifact: d921d8fd9b user: 1codedebugger)
18:26 Reply: sqlite3_expanded_sql for carray with single bound parameter (artifact: eb7b72da43 user: 1codedebugger)
18:18 Reply: sqlite3_expanded_sql for carray with single bound parameter (artifact: 78e9c1ca65 user: 1codedebugger)
08:04 Reply: 3 incorrect tables created during import (artifact: 126c792c50 user: EricTsau)
02:54 Reply: Novice question about employing more complex SQL versus procedural code (artifact: 38231853d0 user: jake)
02:13 Edit reply: sqlite3_expanded_sql for carray with single bound parameter (artifact: 9010d147c3 user: kmedcalf)
02:11 Reply: sqlite3_expanded_sql for carray with single bound parameter (artifact: 3253d0d53b user: kmedcalf)
01:50 Reply: sqlite3_expanded_sql for carray with single bound parameter (artifact: 563e854657 user: jake)
01:24 Post: sqlite3_expanded_sql for carray with single bound parameter (artifact: 8bdeea68bd user: 1codedebugger)
01:18 Reply: Possible Bug - View behaves differently to Table in SELECT (artifact: 52e9c28ea4 user: dpratten)
01:16 Reply: Creating an emty database (artifact: 21fe8931dd user: RichardDamon)
01:11 Reply: Creating an emty database (artifact: 5f617e24e5 user: kmedcalf)
01:09 Reply: Possible Bug - View behaves differently to Table in SELECT (artifact: 2de12cf774 user: dpratten)
01:02 Reply: Novice question about employing more complex SQL versus procedural code (artifact: 4a90f17a99 user: kmedcalf)
00:57 Reply: Creating an emty database (artifact: f3ce5f2f96 user: stephan)
00:44 Post: Creating an emty database (artifact: 62ccd96175 user: oneeyeman)
00:19 Reply: Novice question about employing more complex SQL versus procedural code (artifact: 827409fe28 user: 1codedebugger)
2020-12-25
21:16 Reply: 3 incorrect tables created during import (artifact: 501070a68a user: kmedcalf)
20:58 Reply: 3 incorrect tables created during import (artifact: bbcf6bd5e2 user: kmedcalf)
20:28 Reply: 3 incorrect tables created during import (artifact: 4af0fe7c45 user: EricTsau)
19:57 Reply: Check date when not null (artifact: b07936a4b5 user: kmedcalf)
19:34 Reply: Check date when not null (artifact: 5b0887ebfb user: kmedcalf)
19:34 Edit reply: Check date when not null (artifact: 7e42b6fd52 user: kmedcalf)
19:30 Reply: Check date when not null (artifact: 472a6fae6a user: kmedcalf)
18:50 Edit reply: Check date when not null (artifact: 805f1e5687 user: kmedcalf)
18:03 Reply: Check date when not null (artifact: a586ad0da9 user: kmedcalf)
18:01 Reply: Simple COUNT/GROUP BY query using a temporary table (artifact: f0133fe491 user: JLHainaut)
13:24 Reply: Check date when not null (artifact: 195ddb0623 user: jking)
11:38 Post: Check date when not null (artifact: fefb83b658 user: CecilWesterhof)
11:18 Reply: Interesting question: Why aren't you using SQLite more? (artifact: 5106b1bd20 user: CecilWesterhof)
06:47 Reply: SQLITE_FCNTL_WIN32_GET_HANDLE (artifact: b3e4199bab user: anonymous)
06:39 Reply: Interesting question: Why aren't you using SQLite more? (artifact: 2b7dbae629 user: 1codedebugger)
2020-12-24
23:36 Reply: Interesting question: Why aren't you using SQLite more? (artifact: e71e1c7eb6 user: slavin)
23:26 Reply: Question about Multiple database connections and loadable extensions. (artifact: f69e37b1a1 user: kmedcalf)
22:45 Post: PSTOKEN extension (artifact: ed36cef673 user: anonymous)
21:54 Reply: Question about Multiple database connections and loadable extensions. (artifact: c1cf7afa3a user: 1codedebugger)
17:58 Reply: Interesting question: Why aren't you using SQLite more? (artifact: 39a3ed4889 user: anonymous)
17:51 Reply: SQLITE_FCNTL_WIN32_GET_HANDLE (artifact: 47f322ad0d user: dubiousjim)
16:39 Reply: Interesting question: Why aren't you using SQLite more? (artifact: 9ad99739a8 user: GSnyder)
16:08 Reply: Interesting question: Why aren't you using SQLite more? (artifact: a1f8f48aaa user: jking)
15:35 Post: Interesting question: Why aren't you using SQLite more? (artifact: aeeaa580fa user: anonymous)
13:37 Reply: Legacy functions (artifact: 4940637a1c user: anonymous)