Many hyperlinks are disabled.
Use anonymous login
to enable hyperlinks.
50 most recent events occurring on or after 2021-07-10 16:52:59.
2021-07-11
| ||
22:25 | • Edit reply: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: 499f52aa70 user: kmedcalf | |
22:22 | • Edit reply: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: 8f99ed3223 user: kmedcalf | |
22:05 | • Edit reply: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: 764065ab63 user: kmedcalf | |
22:01 | • Reply: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: 53216b2928 user: kmedcalf | |
20:53 | • Edit reply: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: 50fc0d0a3d user: kmedcalf | |
20:40 | • Edit reply: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: 1c2fbbfae9 user: kmedcalf | |
20:38 | • Edit reply: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: c2bae8c59b user: kmedcalf | |
20:36 | • Edit reply: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: f24446aa83 user: kmedcalf | |
20:24 | • Reply: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: 63ac2b56d2 user: kmedcalf | |
20:12 | • Reply: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: 4f688214ea user: vitalije | |
19:50 | • Reply: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: c9da49bb23 user: kmedcalf | |
19:38 | • Edit reply: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: b23c3d34a0 user: kmedcalf | |
19:36 | • Reply: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: bcfaddd2d3 user: kmedcalf | |
19:14 | • Edit reply: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: ac5ec6aca2 user: vitalije | |
19:10 | • Reply: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: 7c5f4cb8c4 user: vitalije | |
18:43 | • Reply: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: d53b0b1412 user: kmedcalf | |
17:55 | • Post: is it possible to update bunch of records in reverse order to avoid unique constrain violation artifact: 59cf1f8686 user: vitalije | |
16:29 | • Reply: Unstack one column to multiple artifact: fbdf78e300 user: RoboManni | |
16:24 | • Reply: LOAD_EXTENSION: Error: error during initialization: artifact: 424253d93b user: anonymous | |
15:26 | • Edit reply: How much would you trust a page-level checksum ? artifact: dcaa5034c1 user: slavin | |
14:22 | • Reply: How much would you trust a page-level checksum ? artifact: 7d81b9b5a7 user: slavin | |
13:54 | • Reply: Unstack one column to multiple artifact: d98a069d55 user: slavin | |
13:48 | • Reply: Opening a DB with SQLITE_OPEN_EXCLUSIVE artifact: 5a4026484c user: Benjamin | |
13:14 | • Reply: Nonsensical import column separator error artifact: fb0474c876 user: anonymous | |
12:59 | • Reply: Nonsensical import column separator error artifact: 107b788077 user: larrybr | |
12:44 | • Post: Nonsensical import column separator error artifact: a1844c6ec5 user: anonymous | |
12:36 | • Reply: Unstack one column to multiple artifact: be86b27313 user: anonymous | |
12:32 | • Reply: Unstack one column to multiple artifact: 4d754eadfb user: murtazanw | |
12:30 | • Reply: Unstack one column to multiple artifact: 972bc28c80 user: murtazanw | |
12:01 | • Reply: Unstack one column to multiple artifact: 745f7fe347 user: jdennis | |
11:34 | • Edit reply: Can this SQL be simplified? artifact: 2f89b04f4c user: mingodad | |
11:32 | • Reply: Can this SQL be simplified? artifact: f95fc2665b user: mingodad | |
11:19 | • Reply: Unstack one column to multiple artifact: a3726af92d user: cuz | |
10:50 | • Reply: Can this SQL be simplified? artifact: 979bb0e9ad user: anonymous | |
10:12 | • Reply: Why can you write triggers using functions from extensions? How does that work? artifact: 5479482659 user: cuz | |
09:01 | • Reply: Why can you write triggers using functions from extensions? How does that work? artifact: 988b4322a1 user: Isofruit2 | |
08:22 | • Reply: Can this SQL be simplified? artifact: 1d423484ae user: mingodad | |
07:28 | • Post: Unstack one column to multiple artifact: dd33773808 user: murtazanw | |
2021-07-10
| ||
23:08 | • Post: LOAD_EXTENSION: Error: error during initialization: artifact: 9a268f74e5 user: 6kEs4Majrd | |
22:53 | • Reply: Why can you write triggers using functions from extensions? How does that work? artifact: 340e782eac user: larrybr | |
21:33 | • Reply: Why can you write triggers using functions from extensions? How does that work? artifact: a9f795200b user: cuz | |
18:27 | • Reply: Can this SQL be simplified? artifact: ce14a018bc user: anonymous | |
18:23 | • Reply: Can this SQL be simplified? artifact: 35c999666b user: mingodad | |
18:19 | • Reply: Can this SQL be simplified? artifact: 799a40d760 user: mingodad | |
18:05 | • Reply: Can this SQL be simplified? artifact: 3faafc8a11 user: kmedcalf | |
18:04 | • Reply: Can this SQL be simplified? artifact: bf0829e919 user: kmedcalf | |
17:38 | • Reply: Can this SQL be simplified? artifact: 9a67c943f6 user: mingodad | |
17:26 | • Reply: Can this SQL be simplified? artifact: ada2df549f user: mingodad | |
16:55 | • Delete reply: Why can you write triggers using functions from extensions? How does that work? artifact: 5ec4cab66a user: kmedcalf | |
16:52 | • Reply: Why can you write triggers using functions from extensions? How does that work? artifact: 8f2b52a006 user: kmedcalf | |