This Day In History For 2025-06-09
1 Year Ago (more context)
|
2024-06-09
| ||
| 23:02 | • Reply: xCheckReservedLock doc and possible WebAssembly bug artifact: 99b12eb1af user: rhashimoto | |
| 21:18 | • Reply: BUG: round(0.15,1) = 0.1; v3.45.1 artifact: e3e4dbea56 user: anonymous | |
| 20:49 | • Edit: (Deleted) artifact: 92b2f5df7c user: vman59 | |
| 20:49 | • Post: (Deleted) artifact: 46868b740e user: vman59 | |
| 19:39 | • Reply: BUG: round(0.15,1) = 0.1; v3.45.1 artifact: 2fc7ca2e5e user: anonymous | |
| 19:29 | • Reply: BUG: round(0.15,1) = 0.1; v3.45.1 artifact: e967182708 user: stephan | |
| 19:24 | • Reply: BUG: round(0.15,1) = 0.1; v3.45.1 artifact: 3108c156c2 user: anonymous | |
| 19:12 | • Reply: Potential Bugs in SQLite Through SQLancer artifact: 4dfd2fe823 user: drh | |
| 19:11 | • Reply: Potential Bugs in SQLite Through SQLancer artifact: 4f708679a0 user: drh | |
| 19:04 | • Reply: Potential Bugs in SQLite Through SQLancer artifact: b44d55f782 user: 07.artists.bursary | |
| 19:03 | • Edit: Potential Bugs in SQLite Through SQLancer artifact: 0a2361cbf0 user: 07.artists.bursary | |
| 18:57 | • Reply: Potential Bugs in SQLite Through SQLancer artifact: 2ef3b2ac42 user: drh | |
| 18:28 | • Reply: BUG: round(0.15,1) = 0.1; v3.45.1 artifact: 622c94013e user: larrybr | |
| 18:06 | • Edit: Potential Bugs in SQLite Through SQLancer artifact: a049579ffa user: 07.artists.bursary | |
| 17:51 | • Post: Potential Bugs in SQLite Through SQLancer artifact: c83210c198 user: 07.artists.bursary | |
| 15:47 | • Reply: BUG: round(0.15,1) = 0.1; v3.45.1 artifact: 094d73a320 user: anonymous | |
| 15:41 | • Reply: xCheckReservedLock doc and possible WebAssembly bug artifact: 3ec196db97 user: ncruces | |
| 15:23 | • Reply: BUG: round(0.15,1) = 0.1; v3.45.1 artifact: 2232b7f07b user: drh | |
| 14:31 | • Reply: BUG: round(0.15,1) = 0.1; v3.45.1 artifact: b845aa7a7c user: lexfiend | |
| 13:59 | • Edit reply: xCheckReservedLock doc and possible WebAssembly bug artifact: e4eefe58df user: rhashimoto | |
| 13:41 | • Post: Howto force sequential reading of DB file into RAM artifact: 888d5c3df7 user: christophgil | |
| 13:38 | • Reply: BUG: round(0.15,1) = 0.1; v3.45.1 artifact: e1f7222f93 user: anonymous | |
| 13:14 | • Reply: xCheckReservedLock doc and possible WebAssembly bug artifact: cbf9238a5d user: rhashimoto | |
| 13:12 | • Reply: BUG: round(0.15,1) = 0.1; v3.45.1 artifact: 7fecab5e38 user: hanche | |
| 12:15 | • Post: BUG: round(0.15,1) = 0.1; v3.45.1 artifact: c0753dfb2d user: anonymous | |
| 11:39 | • Reply: Question about creating a table via SELECT artifact: ebb709599b user: Clothears | |
| 11:21 | • Reply: Question about creating a table via SELECT artifact: a042226b06 user: Clothears | |
| 11:16 | • Reply: Just Curious: WASM for UDFs - sqlite3 as the host? artifact: 6d8113ef12 user: stephan | |
| 11:16 | • Reply: Question about creating a table via SELECT artifact: a1772a9c58 user: vman59 | |
| 11:06 | • Edit: Just Curious: WASM for UDFs - sqlite3 as the host? artifact: c73afb7a84 user: midijohnny | |
| 11:05 | • Edit: Just Curious: WASM for UDFs - sqlite3 as the host? artifact: ae69138638 user: midijohnny | |
| 11:05 | • Reply: Question about creating a table via SELECT artifact: 5d48c83024 user: jdennis | |
| 11:05 | • Post: Just Curious: WASM for UDFs - sqlite3 as the host? artifact: 053b0404da user: midijohnny | |
| 10:57 | • Post: Question about creating a table via SELECT artifact: c57b20e407 user: Clothears | |
| 09:56 | • Reply: xCheckReservedLock doc and possible WebAssembly bug artifact: ad0ec068cb user: ncruces | |
| 08:45 | • Reply: How to describe this in SQL? artifact: ec8b218670 user: lexfiend | |
| 03:35 | • Reply: Add option for a process exclusive mode to open files on Windows artifact: 199005e25c user: anonymous | |
| 01:29 | • Reply: How to describe this in SQL? artifact: 032c141ffe user: ogogon | |
| 01:23 | • Reply: How to describe this in SQL? artifact: db0980ce62 user: ogogon | |
| 00:31 | • Reply: xCheckReservedLock doc and possible WebAssembly bug artifact: d8ea04732e user: rhashimoto | |
| 00:16 | • Reply: Use transient in-memory SQLite database as inter-thread communication channel? artifact: 36ac860463 user: wyoung | |
2 Years Ago (more context)
|
2023-06-09
| ||
| 22:14 | • Reply: Better explanation about Readonly and ATTACH database artifact: ebefa64744 user: jbulow | |
| 20:36 | • Reply: Option to make SQLite stricter with non-aggregate columns artifact: c849842c2f user: GSnyder | |
| 19:45 | • Reply: Option to make SQLite stricter with non-aggregate columns artifact: d78b1d79fe user: drh | |
| 18:57 | • Reply: Option to make SQLite stricter with non-aggregate columns artifact: eebc147a60 user: spindrift | |
| 18:20 | • Reply: Option to make SQLite stricter with non-aggregate columns artifact: 466889e30e user: dvdraymond | |
| 17:29 | • Edit reply: Option to make SQLite stricter with non-aggregate columns artifact: 9f099a5779 user: spindrift | |
| 17:28 | • Reply: Option to make SQLite stricter with non-aggregate columns artifact: 801849689a user: spindrift | |
| 17:19 | • Reply: Option to make SQLite stricter with non-aggregate columns artifact: b5dad4b83f user: lcarlp | |
| 17:17 | • Reply: Option to make SQLite stricter with non-aggregate columns artifact: 01221383b9 user: kmedcalf | |
| 17:02 | • Reply: Option to make SQLite stricter with non-aggregate columns artifact: 67d8580ab0 user: lcarlp | |
| 16:37 | • Reply: Better explanation about Readonly and ATTACH database artifact: b72b44b174 user: kmedcalf | |
| 16:33 | • Reply: Better explanation about Readonly and ATTACH database artifact: f3ceedb47b user: kmedcalf | |
| 15:20 | • Edit reply: Better explanation about Readonly and ATTACH database artifact: 771be9f3c1 user: jbulow | |
| 15:20 | • Reply: Better explanation about Readonly and ATTACH database artifact: ac9980b463 user: jbulow | |
| 14:07 | • Reply: sqlite3_backup_step() return value artifact: f4062f7489 user: larrybr | |
| 10:44 | • Reply: sqlite3_backup_step() return value artifact: b390291ec5 user: dan | |
| 09:53 | • Reply: Option to make SQLite stricter with non-aggregate columns artifact: d923ef4ad3 user: JLHainaut | |
| 09:17 | • Reply: Option to make SQLite stricter with non-aggregate columns artifact: 2bcc3ed1de user: punkish | |
| 08:01 | • Reply: Option to make SQLite stricter with non-aggregate columns artifact: 558cbf5d45 user: ralfbertling | |
| 03:42 | • Reply: sqlite3_backup_step() return value artifact: 99921c1528 user: sqweek | |
| 01:38 | • Reply: sqlite3_backup_step() return value artifact: 438fb6399b user: anonymous | |
| 01:00 | • Reply: sqlite3_backup_step() return value artifact: faab7ba6b2 user: larrybr | |
| 00:44 | • Post: sqlite3_backup_step() return value artifact: d4368efac8 user: anonymous | |
3 Years Ago (more context)
|
2022-06-09
| ||
| 21:54 | • Reply: A typo in the documentation ? artifact: ed0b5cef1f user: larrybr | |
| 21:04 | • Reply: getting "no suck table" error artifact: 14f38c2f5a user: rbucker | |
| 20:26 | • Reply: Unexpected Result by JSON artifact: 0ac9b89e61 user: drh | |
| 19:40 | • Reply: getting "no suck table" error artifact: 005ea77d1c user: kmedcalf | |
| 19:33 | • Reply: getting "no suck table" error artifact: 2c8d8ab2a5 user: kmedcalf | |
| 19:20 | • Edit reply: getting "no suck table" error artifact: 63f9ff654c user: kmedcalf | |
| 19:20 | • Edit reply: getting "no suck table" error artifact: fa0e63187b user: kmedcalf | |
| 19:08 | • Edit reply: getting "no suck table" error artifact: f220aa62f8 user: kmedcalf | |
| 19:07 | • Reply: getting "no suck table" error artifact: 6818d25cac user: kmedcalf | |
| 18:51 | • Post: A typo in the documentation ? artifact: 9c581dce56 user: anonymous | |
| 18:39 | • Reply: getting "no suck table" error artifact: 64b3e59dcf user: rbucker | |
| 18:36 | • Reply: getting "no suck table" error artifact: 3eec098206 user: rbucker | |
| 18:26 | • Reply: pragma_table_info "no such table" error artifact: 359c304635 user: TedStriker | |
| 18:22 | • Reply: pragma_table_info "no such table" error artifact: 6710edf2c8 user: TedStriker | |
| 18:11 | • Reply: getting "no suck table" error artifact: 4ebef7a438 user: kmedcalf | |
| 18:01 | • Reply: getting "no suck table" error artifact: 0c2431aa64 user: slavin | |
| 17:38 | • Edit reply: getting "no suck table" error artifact: 698877c9ee user: rbucker | |
| 15:24 | • Reply: Database locked exception in Mutlithread App artifact: bc800e690f user: knu | |
| 15:13 | • Reply: getting "no suck table" error artifact: c7477d3720 user: rbucker | |
| 14:58 | • Reply: SQLite warnings in system journal artifact: 3f5217ecaf user: jchd18 | |
| 14:33 | • Reply: pragma_table_info "no such table" error artifact: 8201b34045 user: larrybr | |
| 14:09 | • Reply: Unexpected Result by JSON artifact: b397f23ef4 user: drh | |
| 13:52 | • Reply: Unexpected Result by JSON artifact: e8cf2c5228 user: drh | |
| 13:44 | • Post: pragma_table_info "no such table" error artifact: 4c148b745a user: TedStriker | |
| 13:13 | • Reply: Database locked exception in Mutlithread App artifact: 061e2ed651 user: dkfellows | |
| 12:05 | • Reply: SQLite warnings in system journal artifact: e6a596e73e user: gunter_hick | |
| 10:46 | • Reply: Database locked exception in Mutlithread App artifact: 47b7d17e9a user: kannang | |
| 10:35 | • Reply: SQLite warnings in system journal artifact: 65e9cd737c user: jchd18 | |
| 09:39 | • Reply: SQLite warnings in system journal artifact: 9ed87252b3 user: gunter_hick | |
| 09:28 | • Reply: Database locked exception in Mutlithread App artifact: 481d35125b user: gunter_hick | |
| 09:10 | • Reply: SQLite warnings in system journal artifact: a10a2a1134 user: cmgain | |
| 07:46 | • Post: Unexpected Result by JSON artifact: 3d9caa45cb user: bajinsheng | |
| 02:06 | • Reply: Join Syntax Ignoring Invalid Keywords? artifact: 0c2bcd8770 user: SeverKetor | |
| 01:54 | • Reply: Join Syntax Ignoring Invalid Keywords? artifact: 1e9a6e6b33 user: kmedcalf | |
| 01:43 | • Post: Join Syntax Ignoring Invalid Keywords? artifact: c89ecb7130 user: SeverKetor | |
4 Years Ago (more context)
|
2021-06-09
| ||
| 23:41 | • Reply: Opening a DB with SQLITE_OPEN_EXCLUSIVE artifact: ff875e86d7 user: anonymous | |
| 20:42 | • Post: Bug: ALTER TABLE RENAME TO vs CTE VIEWs / multiple references artifact: 9d965f2956 user: bjoern | |
| 19:55 | • Reply: Using an alias in queries artifact: faa579a3b9 user: cuz | |
| 18:20 | • Reply: Using an alias in queries artifact: 39f0e77d02 user: Trudge | |
| 18:20 | • Reply: The CopySQLiteInteropFiles target in the NuGet package no longer works in Visual Studio 16.10 artifact: bedb26d776 user: mistachkin | |
| 18:10 | • Reply: different query plan result when executed within transaction artifact: 33f13a91e2 user: dan | |
| 17:59 | • Reply: Apps development using sqlite artifact: 5d3a342fcc user: stephan | |
| 17:47 | • Post: Apps development using sqlite artifact: 01dfcb208a user: lionel11 | |
| 17:06 | • Reply: SQLite SEE compatibility with existing CryptoAPI databases artifact: 9d1f69ffe2 user: mistachkin | |
| 16:13 | • Post: different query plan result when executed within transaction artifact: 4a6beb0964 user: markxwagner | |
| 16:02 | • Reply: Feature request: Stored Procedures artifact: cf781da544 user: anonymous | |
| 15:37 | • Post: Using an alias in queries artifact: 172fccd5a2 user: Trudge | |
| 15:15 | • Reply: Feature request: Stored Procedures artifact: a316ef2123 user: RoboManni | |
| 15:06 | • Reply: Feature request: Stored Procedures artifact: 0293f157f9 user: knu | |
| 14:52 | • Reply: Bug in sqlite3_bind_blob64? Database error code is not set artifact: 7e46e93f8d user: drh | |
| 14:51 | • Reply: zeroblob64 and errcode artifact: 68adf1c30e user: drh | |
| 14:12 | • Reply: Question on internals: Sync between WAL and B Tree artifact: bb2e97806e user: younique | |
| 14:07 | • Reply: Feature request: Stored Procedures artifact: b5a3ef442c user: anonymous | |
| 12:34 | • Reply: Feature request: Stored Procedures artifact: 94bb5729f8 user: anonymous | |
| 12:14 | • Reply: Feature request: Stored Procedures artifact: cd05f203c9 user: dvdraymond | |
| 11:06 | • Reply: Feature request: Stored Procedures artifact: d8d7111fa4 user: anonymous | |
| 11:02 | • Post: Bug in sqlite3_bind_blob64? Database error code is not set artifact: 33821c8db5 user: anonymous | |
| 10:30 | • Post: OT POP3 gateway artifact: 686df69ab9 user: anonymous | |
| 10:06 | • Reply: Feature request: Stored Procedures artifact: 746549405a user: anonymous | |
| 10:03 | • Reply: Feature request: Stored Procedures artifact: bfcc8e3026 user: d3x0r | |
| 08:45 | • Reply: Feature request: Stored Procedures artifact: 758a86afa6 user: anonymous | |
| 06:34 | • Post: Typos in Althttpd "Security Features" documentation artifact: e6d72774d2 user: anonymous | |
| 06:18 | • Reply: Interpreting output from showdb artifact: b7fe76fc10 user: jbulow | |
| 05:17 | • Post: SQLite SEE compatibility with existing CryptoAPI databases artifact: 6a1129b8b8 user: anonymous | |
5 Years Ago (more context)
|
2020-06-09
| ||
| 21:35 | • Reply: Odd buffer overflow artifact: 2dcf819224 user: LarryBrasfield | |
| 21:31 | • Reply: Odd buffer overflow artifact: ec517a2646 user: doug9forester | |
| 20:54 | • Post: Odd buffer overflow artifact: c2aabcbbcc user: markstz | |
| 18:37 | • Reply: Unexepected commit result with two threads application artifact: 3c3b577536 user: drh | |
| 18:29 | • Reply: union vs left join for select artifact: d5df059a59 user: kmedcalf | |
| 18:23 | • Reply: Unexepected commit result with two threads application artifact: c8558bdde4 user: brodybits | |
| 17:22 | • Reply: DB operation inside commit hook / enforce explicit INTEGER PRIMARY KEY column artifact: e0c8d816e9 user: sn0wbl1nd | |
| 15:30 | • Reply: union vs left join for select artifact: c3b380b28c user: thebb8 | |
| 13:18 | • Reply: union vs left join for select artifact: 454d663a5c user: kmedcalf | |
| 13:07 | • Reply: union vs left join for select artifact: 323466f281 user: thebb8 | |
| 12:53 | • Reply: union vs left join for select artifact: 2a5859ef92 user: kmedcalf | |
| 12:39 | • Reply: union vs left join for select artifact: ff5c3a49e1 user: cladisch | |
| 12:36 | • Reply: Constraint Name artifact: e1a6a29e2a user: cladisch | |
| 12:33 | • Reply: Constraint Name artifact: 643a903ddb user: kmedcalf | |
| 12:23 | • Edit reply: Constraint Name artifact: fea07633d5 user: vman59 | |
| 12:23 | • Reply: Constraint Name artifact: 60bb7242d6 user: vman59 | |
| 12:16 | • Reply: DB operation inside commit hook / enforce explicit INTEGER PRIMARY KEY column artifact: 17c0c65b13 user: cladisch | |
| 12:15 | • Reply: union vs left join for select artifact: 38d1a7d2ca user: thebb8 | |
| 12:14 | • Reply: union vs left join for select artifact: 81131a17f4 user: thebb8 | |
| 11:45 | • Reply: union vs left join for select artifact: 81f966aebd user: kmedcalf | |
| 11:39 | • Post: Constraint Name artifact: 935d92ac38 user: PetrDaricek | |
| 11:32 | • Reply: union vs left join for select artifact: 4bbed0bc6f user: cladisch | |
| 10:43 | • Post: union vs left join for select artifact: e5570b6002 user: thebb8 | |
| 09:12 | • Reply: PRAGMA wal_checkpoint and sync artifact: 3ddafd7807 user: kmedcalf | |
| 08:48 | • Reply: Is it safe to VACUUM on a new database connection? artifact: 6fbacb228b user: kmedcalf | |
| 02:58 | • Reply: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: dlopen failed: cannot locate symbol "__atomic_store_4" artifact: aa703e8682 user: codeservice | |
| 01:14 | • Reply: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: dlopen failed: cannot locate symbol "__atomic_store_4" artifact: 58860d5c5c user: doug9forester | |
| 00:47 | • Reply: Updating unique columns feature request artifact: 9b39ce979e user: RichardDamon | |