> Isn't that moot, since this thread is about in-memory DBs? Even if it is moot (which i'm not saying it is), Richard provided four more perfectly valid justifications for *not* applying the requested change.
> Isn't that moot, since this thread is about in-memory DBs? Even if it is moot (which i'm not saying it is), Richard provided four more perfectly valid justifications for *not* applying the requested change.