SQLite Forum

CHECK violation during table definition ignored, normal or bug?
Login
Did we lose the table name though? From the tests, it kinda looks that way.  
I very much welcome this change too, although I'd hate to lose the table name.

It's fairly common to have tables with similar structures, in whole or part,  
and thus they could share the same CHECK expressions. The message would then  
be ambiguous, w/o the table name prefixed. *table-name: check-expr* seems like  
a good format, FWIW.