Even with this naming issue aside, "50 or 100 columns" is a schema design smell. Such a table probably holds more than it should, so it would benefit from a pass or three of [normalization](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database_normalization).
Even with this naming issue aside, "50 or 100 columns" is a schema design smell. Such a table probably holds more than it should, so it would benefit from a pass or three of [normalization](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database_normalization).