SQLite Forum

Timeline
Login

Many hyperlinks are disabled.
Use anonymous login to enable hyperlinks.

50 events by user 1codedebugger occurring around 2020-12-24 21:54:49.

2021-01-01
08:41 Edit: (Deleted) artifact: 9eb715cdb2 user: 1codedebugger
08:35 Post: (Deleted) artifact: e9cca44d2d user: 1codedebugger
06:18 Edit: (Deleted) artifact: 3442ff6248 user: 1codedebugger
06:11 Edit: (Deleted) artifact: 118ae78168 user: 1codedebugger
06:11 Edit: (Deleted) artifact: 9f2d132c18 user: 1codedebugger
05:41 Edit: (Deleted) artifact: 1c69f099a4 user: 1codedebugger
05:34 Post: (Deleted) artifact: 46497d2c7b user: 1codedebugger
2020-12-30
08:48 Edit reply: Is using prepared statements without a FROM to employ built-in methods bad practice? artifact: 75d892c523 user: 1codedebugger
08:44 Reply: Is using prepared statements without a FROM to employ built-in methods bad practice? artifact: 43923ffd59 user: 1codedebugger
2020-12-28
00:58 Reply: Is using prepared statements without a FROM to employ built-in methods bad practice? artifact: 8a2b77310b user: 1codedebugger
2020-12-27
22:34 Reply: Is using prepared statements without a FROM to employ built-in methods bad practice? artifact: d82cc7f289 user: 1codedebugger
22:23 Reply: Is using prepared statements without a FROM to employ built-in methods bad practice? artifact: 59b89c270b user: 1codedebugger
20:49 Reply: Is using prepared statements without a FROM to employ built-in methods bad practice? artifact: 588247dfec user: 1codedebugger
20:20 Edit: Is using prepared statements without a FROM to employ built-in methods bad practice? artifact: e40f26fe68 user: 1codedebugger
20:19 Reply: Is using prepared statements without a FROM to employ built-in methods bad practice? artifact: 1362341e88 user: 1codedebugger
02:47 Edit reply: Question about Multiple database connections and loadable extensions. artifact: ddd21897a6 user: 1codedebugger
2020-12-26
20:40 Delete reply: Interesting question: Why aren't you using SQLite more? artifact: 161ca1d86f user: 1codedebugger
19:35 Post: Is using prepared statements without a FROM to employ built-in methods bad practice? artifact: 55a255cd76 user: 1codedebugger
18:30 Reply: Question about Multiple database connections and loadable extensions. artifact: d921d8fd9b user: 1codedebugger
18:26 Reply: sqlite3_expanded_sql for carray with single bound parameter artifact: eb7b72da43 user: 1codedebugger
18:18 Reply: sqlite3_expanded_sql for carray with single bound parameter artifact: 78e9c1ca65 user: 1codedebugger
01:24 Post: sqlite3_expanded_sql for carray with single bound parameter artifact: 8bdeea68bd user: 1codedebugger
00:19 Reply: Novice question about employing more complex SQL versus procedural code artifact: 827409fe28 user: 1codedebugger
2020-12-25
06:39 Reply: Interesting question: Why aren't you using SQLite more? artifact: 2b7dbae629 user: 1codedebugger
2020-12-24
21:54 Reply: Question about Multiple database connections and loadable extensions. artifact: c1cf7afa3a user: 1codedebugger
06:34 Reply: Question about Multiple database connections and loadable extensions. artifact: 147af79bda user: 1codedebugger
2020-12-23
22:35 Reply: Is it possible to bind a single ? in a parameterized query to a listing of values for an in clause? artifact: 5bb0b7508e user: 1codedebugger
22:34 Edit reply: Question about Multiple database connections and loadable extensions. artifact: 4cf12c6d70 user: 1codedebugger
22:28 Reply: Question about Multiple database connections and loadable extensions. artifact: 005cab6dad user: 1codedebugger
18:05 Post: Question about Multiple database connections and loadable extensions. artifact: 57bd2ac7f9 user: 1codedebugger
06:39 Edit reply: Is it possible to bind a single ? in a parameterized query to a listing of values for an in clause? artifact: 63a448ab3a user: 1codedebugger
06:37 Delete reply: Is it possible to bind a single ? in a parameterized query to a listing of values for an in clause? artifact: c06a08f138 user: 1codedebugger
05:53 Reply: Is it possible to bind a single ? in a parameterized query to a listing of values for an in clause? artifact: 6ee428c929 user: 1codedebugger
05:50 Edit reply: Is it possible to bind a single ? in a parameterized query to a listing of values for an in clause? artifact: 5d6a34086e user: 1codedebugger
05:50 Edit reply: Is it possible to bind a single ? in a parameterized query to a listing of values for an in clause? artifact: 9bc9399491 user: 1codedebugger
05:39 Edit reply: Is it possible to bind a single ? in a parameterized query to a listing of values for an in clause? artifact: 6add153624 user: 1codedebugger
05:13 Edit reply: Is it possible to bind a single ? in a parameterized query to a listing of values for an in clause? artifact: 1a2b130cd2 user: 1codedebugger
05:03 Edit reply: Is it possible to bind a single ? in a parameterized query to a listing of values for an in clause? artifact: f4fd64b8e4 user: 1codedebugger
05:03 Edit reply: Is it possible to bind a single ? in a parameterized query to a listing of values for an in clause? artifact: 03c803b4ce user: 1codedebugger
05:02 Reply: Is it possible to bind a single ? in a parameterized query to a listing of values for an in clause? artifact: b8120fe243 user: 1codedebugger
04:43 Edit reply: Is it possible to bind a single ? in a parameterized query to a listing of values for an in clause? artifact: 7f5ff7995b user: 1codedebugger
04:41 Reply: Is it possible to bind a single ? in a parameterized query to a listing of values for an in clause? artifact: 8c94596b57 user: 1codedebugger
2020-12-22
20:06 Reply: Novice question about employing more complex SQL versus procedural code artifact: 5632f57618 user: 1codedebugger
19:42 Reply: Is it possible to bind a single ? in a parameterized query to a listing of values for an in clause? artifact: 8882874efd user: 1codedebugger
07:33 Edit: Is it possible to bind a single ? in a parameterized query to a listing of values for an in clause? artifact: 6bcca8840a user: 1codedebugger
07:30 Post: Is it possible to bind a single ? in a parameterized query to a listing of values for an in clause? artifact: fb74d21679 user: 1codedebugger
07:18 Reply: Novice question about employing more complex SQL versus procedural code artifact: 15f7261a0a user: 1codedebugger
03:12 Edit: Novice question about employing more complex SQL versus procedural code artifact: 82f3082cd0 user: 1codedebugger
03:08 Post: Novice question about employing more complex SQL versus procedural code artifact: d8117d262b user: 1codedebugger
02:29 Reply: sqlite3_bind_text with SQLITE_STATIC and SQLITE_TRANSIENT artifact: d515698899 user: 1codedebugger