Many hyperlinks are disabled.
Use anonymous login
to enable hyperlinks.
50 events occurring around bacaa1ab024ba5f0.
2020-12-22
| ||
20:00 | • Reply: Consistency of sqlite3_column_* API signatures artifact: 3ff5183018 user: anonymous | |
19:42 | • Reply: Is it possible to bind a single ? in a parameterized query to a listing of values for an in clause? artifact: 8882874efd user: 1codedebugger | |
19:36 | • Reply: Date & Time Data Type artifact: f769ef3880 user: kmedcalf | |
19:28 | • Reply: Date & Time Data Type artifact: 7dd73f93aa user: jking | |
19:01 | • Post: Date & Time Data Type artifact: 9e5b6175fc user: anonymous | |
18:15 | • Reply: historic version documentation artifact: e7c330ab9b user: wyoung | |
13:55 | • Edit reply: bad plan for a query with an OR condition artifact: 8ba73575d5 user: dvdraymond | |
13:50 | • Reply: bad plan for a query with an OR condition artifact: f463bc95cf user: dvdraymond | |
13:41 | • Reply: sqlite3_bind_text with SQLITE_STATIC and SQLITE_TRANSIENT artifact: e555ab52ac user: anonymous | |
13:36 | • Reply: sqlite3_bind_text with SQLITE_STATIC and SQLITE_TRANSIENT artifact: ae26d518ef user: drh | |
13:29 | • Reply: bad plan for a query with an OR condition artifact: 6fdb48f661 user: holgerj | |
11:01 | • Edit reply: Possible Bug - View behaves differently to Table in SELECT artifact: 0948eec194 user: dan | |
11:00 | • Reply: Possible Bug - View behaves differently to Table in SELECT artifact: f58cf903a7 user: dan | |
10:56 | • Reply: Novice question about employing more complex SQL versus procedural code artifact: d10b6adf25 user: cuz | |
09:42 | • Reply: Is it possible to bind a single ? in a parameterized query to a listing of values for an in clause? artifact: 0eecae1b74 user: jake | |
09:10 | • Reply: sqlite3_bind_text with SQLITE_STATIC and SQLITE_TRANSIENT artifact: d892850574 user: anonymous | |
07:46 | • Edit reply: CREATE INDEX ignoring pragma cache_size - is there a way to fix? artifact: ee125fda87 user: curmudgeon | |
07:33 | • Edit: Is it possible to bind a single ? in a parameterized query to a listing of values for an in clause? artifact: 6bcca8840a user: 1codedebugger | |
07:30 | • Post: Is it possible to bind a single ? in a parameterized query to a listing of values for an in clause? artifact: fb74d21679 user: 1codedebugger | |
07:18 | • Reply: Novice question about employing more complex SQL versus procedural code artifact: 15f7261a0a user: 1codedebugger | |
03:44 | • Reply: Novice question about employing more complex SQL versus procedural code artifact: f260acc733 user: jake | |
03:12 | • Edit: Novice question about employing more complex SQL versus procedural code artifact: 82f3082cd0 user: 1codedebugger | |
03:08 | • Post: Novice question about employing more complex SQL versus procedural code artifact: d8117d262b user: 1codedebugger | |
02:29 | • Reply: sqlite3_bind_text with SQLITE_STATIC and SQLITE_TRANSIENT artifact: d515698899 user: 1codedebugger | |
02:00 | • Reply: sqlite3_bind_text with SQLITE_STATIC and SQLITE_TRANSIENT artifact: bacaa1ab02 user: LarryBrasfield | |
01:52 | • Reply: sqlite3_bind_text with SQLITE_STATIC and SQLITE_TRANSIENT artifact: 01ef99ae95 user: 1codedebugger | |
01:39 | • Reply: sqlite3_bind_text with SQLITE_STATIC and SQLITE_TRANSIENT artifact: 360512d027 user: drh | |
01:14 | • Post: sqlite3_bind_text with SQLITE_STATIC and SQLITE_TRANSIENT artifact: 6bd0c53d9d user: 1codedebugger | |
2020-12-21
| ||
21:26 | • Post: Consistency of sqlite3_column_* API signatures artifact: bea5e0cbc9 user: anonymous | |
20:52 | • Reply: Segmentation-Fault with prepared statement artifact: bd706d2342 user: drh | |
20:52 | • Edit: Segmentation-Fault with prepared statement artifact: 5fbedcae69 user: jens1205 | |
20:38 | • Post: Segmentation-Fault with prepared statement artifact: 4c609a4d7a user: jens1205 | |
20:12 | • Reply: CREATE INDEX ignoring pragma cache_size - is there a way to fix? artifact: 17dc88cdff user: kmedcalf | |
18:34 | • Reply: CREATE INDEX ignoring pragma cache_size - is there a way to fix? artifact: c5081ca0be user: anonymous | |
18:32 | • Reply: CREATE INDEX ignoring pragma cache_size - is there a way to fix? artifact: f355e9e80f user: kmedcalf | |
18:27 | • Reply: CREATE INDEX ignoring pragma cache_size - is there a way to fix? artifact: 8d84b45fc3 user: kmedcalf | |
18:22 | • Reply: CREATE INDEX ignoring pragma cache_size - is there a way to fix? artifact: 403900c463 user: kmedcalf | |
17:59 | • Reply: CREATE INDEX ignoring pragma cache_size - is there a way to fix? artifact: 0c262eefb2 user: kmedcalf | |
15:50 | • Edit reply: bad plan for a query with an OR condition artifact: 776b2b39dc user: jivancic | |
15:47 | • Reply: CREATE INDEX ignoring pragma cache_size - is there a way to fix? artifact: 5b28a197dc user: curmudgeon | |
15:46 | • Reply: bad plan for a query with an OR condition artifact: d05e658556 user: dvdraymond | |
15:45 | • Reply: bad plan for a query with an OR condition artifact: d2c47462d8 user: drh | |
15:17 | • Reply: bad plan for a query with an OR condition artifact: 6dfcd1a6a7 user: jivancic | |
14:52 | • Reply: CLI Read Only Mode artifact: a393243537 user: drh | |
14:45 | • Reply: bad plan for a query with an OR condition artifact: 4e19a7cb8f user: drh | |
14:40 | • Reply: sqlite3_complete artifact: 722d43a14f user: drh | |
14:38 | • Reply: CREATE INDEX ignoring pragma cache_size - is there a way to fix? artifact: a3f957e34a user: anonymous | |
14:30 | • Reply: OT: APSW on Python 3.9 artifact: a161d08001 user: ddevienne | |
14:07 | • Post: sqlite3_complete artifact: 18f2619ce1 user: anonymous | |
13:43 | • Reply: CLI Read Only Mode artifact: b5d1e6913e user: anonymous | |