Many hyperlinks are disabled.
Use anonymous login
to enable hyperlinks.
50 events occurring around 9c38a1e92cc0417e.
2020-12-29
| ||
19:09 | • Reply: Database is read-only but file permissions seem correct - config issue? artifact: fb43e269f4 user: kmedcalf | |
18:55 | • Reply: Row count artifact: 728c66909a user: dvdraymond | |
18:22 | • Reply: sqlite opens a database file in R/W mode, even if the file is read-only artifact: 42cf8e985b user: dvdraymond | |
17:54 | • Reply: Row count artifact: a25e5c7722 user: anonymous | |
17:32 | • Reply: Suggestion: Use strong hashes on the download page artifact: ddc2e38c4e user: anonymous | |
16:32 | • Reply: Suggestion: Use strong hashes on the download page artifact: f4a182d043 user: anonymous | |
16:27 | • Edit: (Deleted) artifact: 96853fbee2 user: drh | |
16:10 | • Post: Database is read-only but file permissions seem correct - config issue? artifact: a270ca3d16 user: SQLight | |
13:50 | • Post: Row count artifact: 39140fb9dc user: pcurtis | |
13:39 | • Post: (Deleted) artifact: eb1adb31c4 user: anonymous | |
12:01 | • Reply: DbStat via JDBC artifact: 1ae803767e user: gunter_hick | |
08:46 | • Reply: sqlite-gui application artifact: 332f5c87ae user: anonymous | |
07:21 | • Reply: Creating an emty database artifact: 7208209cf9 user: anonymous | |
06:17 | • Reply: DbStat via JDBC artifact: b85b87cfc9 user: dprutean | |
01:08 | • Reply: Missing comma in ctime.c artifact: f968a6a5f0 user: rillig | |
00:24 | • Reply: Missing comma in ctime.c artifact: c87dbf0e74 user: kmedcalf | |
2020-12-28
| ||
23:47 | • Reply: Missing comma in ctime.c artifact: d2de04cf31 user: LarryBrasfield | |
23:00 | • Reply: Suggestion: Use strong hashes on the download page artifact: 05c1fa3e4e user: drh | |
22:18 | • Reply: Suggestion: Use strong hashes on the download page artifact: 6f9048626c user: kmedcalf | |
22:07 | • Reply: Missing comma in ctime.c artifact: ab086d0def user: rillig | |
21:43 | • Reply: Suggestion: Use strong hashes on the download page artifact: ac29b8f0f5 user: anonymous | |
21:36 | • Edit reply: Off-by-one in testing.html artifact: 0ff5a77a45 user: kmedcalf | |
21:32 | • Reply: Off-by-one in testing.html artifact: f028ae2534 user: kmedcalf | |
21:11 | • Post: Missing comma in ctime.c artifact: aacac97680 user: kmedcalf | |
19:05 | • Reply: Off-by-one in testing.html artifact: 2383d81107 user: RichardDamon | |
18:21 | • Reply: Off-by-one in testing.html artifact: 9c38a1e92c user: wyoung | |
10:47 | • Reply: DbStat via JDBC artifact: 3ced7a6725 user: curmudgeon | |
09:32 | • Post: DbStat via JDBC artifact: 152bb9e71b user: dprutean | |
08:39 | • Reply: Huge WAL file, but not for the usual reasons artifact: 9f902733f5 user: relatively_random | |
03:10 | • Reply: on conflict depends on conflict artifact: a3ea04d182 user: kmedcalf | |
02:53 | • Edit reply: on conflict depends on conflict artifact: f80a710938 user: kmedcalf | |
02:49 | • Reply: on conflict depends on conflict artifact: 5b7102a3b2 user: kmedcalf | |
01:34 | • Post: on conflict depends on conflict artifact: 6d558007a4 user: moskvich412 | |
00:58 | • Reply: Is using prepared statements without a FROM to employ built-in methods bad practice? artifact: 8a2b77310b user: 1codedebugger | |
00:26 | • Edit reply: Is using prepared statements without a FROM to employ built-in methods bad practice? artifact: 2e890e6751 user: kmedcalf | |
00:18 | • Reply: Is using prepared statements without a FROM to employ built-in methods bad practice? artifact: ada216320e user: kmedcalf | |
2020-12-27
| ||
23:00 | • Reply: .timer on artifact: 482b955cfc user: kmedcalf | |
22:34 | • Reply: Is using prepared statements without a FROM to employ built-in methods bad practice? artifact: d82cc7f289 user: 1codedebugger | |
22:29 | • Reply: Is using prepared statements without a FROM to employ built-in methods bad practice? artifact: f3d7bee10a user: kmedcalf | |
22:29 | • Reply: .timer on artifact: 385863c55d user: slavin | |
22:23 | • Reply: Is using prepared statements without a FROM to employ built-in methods bad practice? artifact: 59b89c270b user: 1codedebugger | |
22:20 | • Reply: Is using prepared statements without a FROM to employ built-in methods bad practice? artifact: d34ca5b5ce user: kmedcalf | |
22:13 | • Edit reply: Is using prepared statements without a FROM to employ built-in methods bad practice? artifact: 71c54ab13e user: kmedcalf | |
22:07 | • Edit reply: Is using prepared statements without a FROM to employ built-in methods bad practice? artifact: eca46565bf user: kmedcalf | |
22:04 | • Reply: Is using prepared statements without a FROM to employ built-in methods bad practice? artifact: a4ab1774e2 user: kmedcalf | |
21:35 | • Reply: .timer on artifact: 20c102e438 user: anonymous | |
21:22 | • Edit reply: Is using prepared statements without a FROM to employ built-in methods bad practice? artifact: 3d4771cf05 user: kmedcalf | |
21:19 | • Reply: Is using prepared statements without a FROM to employ built-in methods bad practice? artifact: 9466132f15 user: kmedcalf | |
20:49 | • Reply: Is using prepared statements without a FROM to employ built-in methods bad practice? artifact: 588247dfec user: 1codedebugger | |
20:45 | • Reply: Is using prepared statements without a FROM to employ built-in methods bad practice? artifact: 2a68bbc400 user: kmedcalf | |