(1) By anonymous on 2021-07-13 19:06:01 [link] [source]
Bearing in mind the strict adherence to DO-178B, is there any value in these compiler security options? Does my 64-bit build otherwise improve performance over the official Linux binary? $ for x in sqlite3 sqlite3.i386; do ll $x; hardening-check $x; done -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1954360 Jul 13 13:47 sqlite3 sqlite3: Position Independent Executable: yes Stack protected: yes Fortify Source functions: yes (some protected functions found) Read-only relocations: yes Immediate binding: yes -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1169124 Jul 6 13:53 sqlite3.i386 sqlite3.i386: Position Independent Executable: no, normal executable! Stack protected: no, not found! Fortify Source functions: no, only unprotected functions found! Read-only relocations: no, not found! Immediate binding: no, not found! $ file sqlite3 sqlite3.i386 sqlite3: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.32, BuildID[sha1]=90c166105dd34b2bd78eb3eb36622c01f855df8b, not stripped sqlite3.i386: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 4.3.0, stripped $ cat sqlite-autoconf-3360000.configure CFLAGS='-O3 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector-strong -fpic -pie' \ LDFLAGS='-Wl,-z,relro,-z,now -Wl,-z,now' ./configure
(2) By anonymous on 2021-07-14 00:37:27 in reply to 1 [link] [source]
Furthermore, why is the sqlite3 binary offered in the tools collection compiled 32-bit?
This user space is 3 gigabytes on Linux, and 2 gigabytes on Windows.
Is this done so the DO-178B test suite can run correctly?
(3) By Richard Hipp (drh) on 2021-07-14 00:51:27 in reply to 2 [source]
All of our tests run 64-bit, except when we are deliberately testing for compatibility with 32-bit hardware. We offer 32-bit downloads because people request them.
(4) By anonymous on 2021-07-14 01:02:45 in reply to 3 [link] [source]
A thousand thanks for your reply.
I trust your judgment, but curious as to large joins or sorts with a 3/2Gb user space, in the context of Oracle's sort_area_size.
Focal question: is FORTIFY_SOURCE at all helpful, or should I discard it?
(5) By anonymous on 2021-07-14 02:15:34 in reply to 4 [link] [source]
I will quote your sagacious reply in my article.