> Comments, for or against, or improvement suggestions, are welcome. FWIW: definitely. i don't know for sure that it benefits from being configurable, though. Perhaps a slight simplification would suffice: ``` <compile> -DSQLITE_CUSTOM_H ... // in the amalgamation... #if defined(SQLITE_CUSTOM_H) # include "sqlite3_custom.h" #endif ``` One advantage to that approach, compared to a customizable name, is that people hopping from project to project would know the file's name without having to look it up in the build scripts. Since multiple such includes can't really be a thing, it "stands to reason" that a single, well-defined name "should" suffice. 0.02€ and all that, of course.