Interesting. Seems like a better name for those entities would be "global variables" as opposed to "functions". I'm all for backwards compatibility so if they are considered functions in the 40+ years of SQL nomenclature then ok. Thank you Tom
Interesting. Seems like a better name for those entities would be "global variables" as opposed to "functions". I'm all for backwards compatibility so if they are considered functions in the 40+ years of SQL nomenclature then ok. Thank you Tom